Leveling and Spotlighting: How the European Court of Justice Favors the Weak to Promote Its Legitimacy

Abstract

As private actors turn to international courts (ICs), we argue that judges can adopt pro-individual rights agendas to promote their own legitimacy. By leveling the odds for disempowered individuals and spotlighting their rights claims, ICs rebut charges that they are playthings of the powerful and cultivate support networks in civil society. We assess our theory by scrutinizing the first IC with private access: the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Established as an economic court and alleged to conceal a pro-business bias, we leverage original data demonstrating that the ECJ publicizes itself as protector of individuals and matches words with deeds. The ECJ ‘levels’, favoring individuals’ rights claims over claims raised by businesses boasting better legal teams. The ECJ then ‘spotlights’ pro-individual rights rulings via press releases that lawyers amplify in law journals. These findings challenge claims that ICs build legitimacy by stealth and the ‘haves’ come out ahead in litigation.

Reference

• Hermansen, Silje Synnøve Lyder, Tommaso Pavone and Louisa Boulaziz (2025) “Leveling and Spotlighting: How the European Court of Justice Favors the Weak to Promote Its Legitimacy” British Journal of Political Science, 55, pp 1-35.