(2026) European Union Politics, 27(1), pp 1-45 How do the Court of Justice of the EU's politics look today?
(2025) British Journal of Political Science, 2025, pp 1-35. Judges can adopt pro-individual rights agendas to promote their own legitimacy by leveling the odds for disempowered individuals and spotlighting their rights claims.
(2025) Empirical Legal Studies of EU Law. D. Naurin, U. Sadl, & J. Zglinski (Eds.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp X-XX. In this chapter, we situate EU law litigation in a broader comparative context by answering three questions: who litigates EU law, who influences ECJ decisions, with what downstream effects?
(2025) Journal of Politics, forthcoming, pp 1-35. CJEU judges are (re)selected by national governments for their left-right ideological preferences and potential influence on the Court
What are the strategic considerations guiding decision making by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)?
Master's level. University of Copenhagen. Department of Political Science. 2024
(2024) Revisiting Judicial Politics in the European Union, Edward Elgar Publishing. pp 282-304. This chapter inquires whether the European Court of Justice (the Court, ECJ) authoritatively settles or cautiously avoids salient legal matters in times of political division.
(2023) The Journal of Law and Courts, 11(2), pp. 389-410 We introduce data on decisions and decision makers in the Court of Justice of the European Union.
I open the black box of the decision-making process to consider governments’ and judges’ strategic behavior in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
(2020) Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), pp 1215-1235 Best papers from the European Union Studies Association 2019 Biennial Conference in Denver, USA.